Until recently, the science of the future was supposed to be electronics and artificial in

Until recently, the science of the future was supposed to be electronics and artificial intelligence. Today it seems more and more likely that the next great breakthroughs in technology will be brought through a bination of those two sciences with organic chemistry and genetic engineering. This bination is the science of biotechnology.
Organic chemistry enables us to produce marvelous synthetic materials. However, it is still difficult to manufacture anything that has the capacity of wool to conserve (保存) heat and also to absorb moisture. Nothing that we have been able to produce so far es anywhere near the bination of strength, lightness and flexibility that we find in the bodies of ordinary insects.
Nevertheless, scientists in the laboratory have already succeeded in growing a material that has many of the characteristics of human skin. The next step may well be biotech hearts and eyes which can replace diseased organs in human beings. These will not be rejected by the body, as is the case with organs from humans.
The application of biotechnology to energy production seems even more promising. In 1996 the famous science fiction writer, Arthur C. Clarke, many of whose previous predictions have e true, said that we may soon be able to develop remarkably cheap and renewable sources of energy. Some of these power sources will be biological. Clarke and others have warned us repeatedly that sooner or later we will have to give up our dependence on non-renewable power sources. Coal, oil and gas are indeed convenient. However, using them also means creating dangerously high levels of pollution. It will be impossible to meet the growing demand for energy without increasing that pollution to catastrophic (灾难性的) levels unless we develop power sources that are both cheaper and cleaner.
It is attempting to think that biotechnology or some other science of the future can solve our problems. Before we surrender to that temptation we should remember nuclear power. Only a few generations ago it seemed to promise limitless, cheap and safe energy. Today those promises lie buried in a concrete grave in a place called Chernobyl, in the Ukraine. Biotechnology is unlikely, however, to break its promises in quite the same or such a dangerous way.
【小题1】According to the passage, the science of the future is likely to be     .A．electronicsB．biotechnologyC．genetic engineeringD．nuclear technology【小题2】The materials produced with organic chemistry are     .at present.A．as good as woolB．as good as an insect's bodyC．better than natural materialsD．not as good as natural materials【小题3】According to the passage, it may soon be possible     .A．to transplant human organsB．to make artificial hearts and eyesC．to produce drugs without side effectsD．to make something as good as human skin【小题4】In 1996, Arthur C. Clarke predicted that    .
A. the Chernobyl disaster would happen in two years
B. we will never stop using non-renewable power sources biological  
C. oil, gas and coal could be repeatedly used in the future
D. power sources would be put into use soon
【小题5】What do we learn from the last paragraph?A．Biological power will keep all its promises.B．Biological power is cheaper than nuclear power.C．Biotechnology can solve all our future energy problemsD．Biological power may not be as dangerous as nuclear powerB