Public caught up in argument over safety of genetically modified or simply GM products, report Zhang Lei and Zhong Nan in Beijing.
More than 300 people gathered to enjoy a bowl of porridge made from genetically modified food on Saturday, an attempt to quell public fears about the safety of the product.
The first China Golden Rice Tasting Event was held at Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan, Hubei province, sparking another round in the nationwide debate about the safety of GM crops, often called Frankenfood by opponents.
Similar events have been held in more than 28 cities since May, the university said.
Both the pro and anti camps have posted conflicting ments on the Internet, with each providing evidence to back up their beliefs, but the exchanges are being increasingly bitter.
Jiang Tao, a senior engineer at the Center for Agricultural Resources Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who is in favor of GM foods, was annoyed about what he called amateurs spreading rumors.
Just look at the people who are opposed to GM foods; can you find anyone from a related field in the scientific munity? he asked. Jiang also accused the anti-GM lobby of repeatedly using outdated or inaccurate data to support an incorrect stance.
Chen Yunfa, an independent researcher into the Yangtze River Delta economy, recently wrote a mentary on the Internet news portal Eastday in which he criticized the actions of the 61 scientists, saying they had gone beyond their proper duty. He suggested that large multinational corporations might be behind the letter and similar incidents, prompted by a desire to freeze China's patent hybrid rice technology out of the market.
To support his contentions, Chen said that GM rice, first produced by scientists in the US, still hasn't gained official approval from the US government. However, the US authorities have actually granted licenses to six varieties of GM rice. The mercial planting of two varieties - anti-herbicide (BAR) transgenic rice LL RICE 06 and LL RICE 62 - produced by the French pharmaceutical pany Sanofi-Aventis, was approved in 1999 and a license for cultivation for edible use was granted in 2000.
The public outcry for GM labeling and boycotting has hindered the advancement of the technology. Concern about GM foods has been fueled by studies like the one published by French professor Gilles-Eric Séralini in September 2012. Séralini claimed that his research involving rats proved that the GM corn fed to them caused tumor growth. Furthermore, there is growing concern that the pesticides(杀虫剂) used on GMOs(转基因作物)are contributing to the decline of the world’s honey bee population, leading to honey bee deaths by infecting the brains of the insects with toxins. Therefore, some experts remend the labeling of non-GM foods so that consumers can make that decision without a regulatory burden being placed on GMOs.
However, we should be cautious about anything that may risk humans’ life. Only time will tell.
【小题1】Why did more than 300 people enjoy porridge made from genetically modified food? A．To show evidence that GM products are dangerous.B．To support that the first China Golden Rice Tasting is safe.C．To rid public of fears and worries about the safety of GM foods. D．To draw public’s attention to nationwide planting of GM products.【小题2】Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?A．Those who are for GM products and those who are against keep arguing fiercely by holding conferences.B．People are failing to show evidence to support their pros and cons, although they hold a firm belief of their own.C．Some people think those against GM foods have a good knowledge of GM technology and are spreading rumors.D．GM food may be just a way for some multinational corporations to drive China’s patent hybrid rice out of the market.【小题3】What can we infer from the second paragraph from bottom?A．The public advocated that GM products should be labeled clearly.B．Séralini claimed that his research proved the GM corn caused rats to grow faster.C．Many honey bees have died because they were fed with GM corn. D．There should be some restrictions on GM products’ selling.【小题4】What is the writer’s attitude towards GM products?A．Supportive.B．Suspicious.C．Indifferent.D．Critical.C
网友回答
(答案→)C
解析：本篇是一则新闻报道，报到公众卷入转基因食品是否安全的争论中。
【小题1】C推理判断题。根据第二段中“an attempt to quell public fears about the safety of the product”可知“300多人集中品尝转基因稀饭，其目的是：试图消除公众对转基因产品是否安全的恐惧”，故选项C正确。
【小题2】D推理判断题。根据倒数第四段“He suggested that large multinational corporations might be behind
the letter and similar incidents, prompted by a desire to freeze China's patent hybrid rice technology out of the
market.”可以知道“大多数跨国公司想利用转基因产品把中国的具有专利权的杂交水稻挤出市场”，故D
项正确。
【小题3】A主旨大意题。根据本段的最后一句话“Therefore, some experts remend the labeling of non-GM foods so that consumers can make that decision without a regulatory burden being placed on GMOs.”可以得到答案A 正确。
【小题4】B推理判断题。根据文章最后一句话“However, we should be cautious about anything that may risk humans’ life. Only time will tell.(然而，我们对待任何可能的危及人类的生活事情应该持谨慎的态度。<转基因产品是否安全>只有等待时间来检验即只有天知道)”说明作者对“转基因产品”的安全问题持怀疑的态度。