Think of London and you will probably remember the bright red double-decker buses. Think of Thailand’s capital city, Bangkok, and the noisy tuk-tuks may e to mind. Think of San Francisco and you might see the city’s cable cars.
Imagining what these cities would look like without those is difficult. They are symbols of these cities that make them different. However, these city symbols are not always so well loved by their city leaders. City leaders want what is best for their city, which often means the most modern transport.
In Bangkok, city leaders have banned(禁止)tuk-tuks because they consider them noisy and polluting. However, the ban has largely been unsuccessful as it has not changed Thai people’s love for the cheap tuk-tuks over taxis.
In London the city’s first ever mayor(市长)removed the red double-decker buses, which he thought were old fashioned. His plan worked, but Londoners were unhappy to lose the nice old buses they believed represented the best of their city. They made their unhappiness felt when the mayor came up for re-election. Most Londoners voted for his petitor, who promised to bring the bus back.
As for San Francisco, several cable cars are still in use but mainly as tourist attractions. They are too slow to be used for anything other than scenic trips.
City transport symbols may have a place in their city people’s hearts, but it seems they are increasingly out of step with the modern world. As Londoners have proved, their continued life depends on people’s willingness to fight for their survival.
【小题1】 What’s the author’s purpose of writing the first paragraph? A．To introduce some city transport symbols. B．To explain why some cities are popular. C．To talk about modern transport in some cities. D．To attract more tourists to visit some cities.【小题2】The London double-decker bus is returning mainly because . A．the new mayor loves itB．Londoners fought for itC．it is an improved transportD．it is popular with tourists【小题3】 Which proves the old city transport symbols are not loved by city leaders? A．Only a few cable cars are still in use in San Francisco. B．Bangkok city leaders tried to remove the cheap tuk-tuks. C．The mayor who sold double-decker buses lost the re-election. D．The new mayor will bring back improved double-decker buses.【小题4】 What can we infer from the passage? A．Modern cities should remove old city transport symbols. B．The writer thinks highly of the old city transport symbols. C．Old city transport symbols face the problem of survival. D．Tourist cities will lose their attraction without the symbols.A
网友回答
(答案→)A
解析：本文主要介绍了不同城市的标志性的交通工具, 以及和这些交通工具相关的趣事。
【小题1】选A。主旨大意题。从第一段可以看出不同城市有不同的象征性的交通工具, 有泰国的tuk-tuks; 英国的double-decker汽车等。故A项正确。
【小题2】选B。细节理解题。根据第四段最后伦敦的大多数市民都投票选举了答应使用double-decker汽车的竞选人, 而不给反对这种汽车的竞选人投票。由文章最后一句话也可得出同样的答案,故选B项。
【小题3】选B。细节理解题。根据第三段第一句话可知在曼谷, 市长禁止这种车的使用, 故B项正确。
【小题4】选C。推理判断题。根据最后一段第一句话的句意“尽管这些标志性的交通工具在人们心中占有一席之地, 但是跟不上现代社会的发展步伐。”可推知这些旧的交通方式面临着生存问题。