任务型阅读(10’):每空填一词。Nowadays people use different ways to communicate with each other. And do

任务型阅读(10’):每空填一词。
Nowadays people use different ways to municate with each other. And does one always tell the truth when he or she talks with the other on the phone? Or does one sometimes tell a lie when writing an e-mail or giving an instant message? Recent research has found that munication technologies are far from equal when it es to conveying the truth. The first study, made by Jeff Hancock of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, to pare honesty across a range of munication media has found that people are twice as likely to tell lies in phone conversations as they are in e-mails. The fact that e-mails are automatically recorded--- and can e back to trouble you---appears to be the key to the finding.
Jeff Hancock made an investigation by asking 30 students to keep a munication diary for a week. In it they noted the number of conversations or e-mail exchanges they had lasting more than 10 minutes, and how many lies they told. Hancock then worked out the number of lies per conversation for each medium. He found that lies made up 14 percent of e-mails, 21 percent of instant messages, 27 percent of face-to-face interactions and an astonishing 37 percent of phone calls.
His results, to be presented at the conference on human puter interaction in Vienna, Austria, in April, have surprised psychologists. Some expected e-mailers to be the biggest liars, reasoning that because the unreal condition makes people unfortable, the detachment(非直接接触) of e-mailing would make it easier to lie. Others expected people to lie more in face-to-face exchanges because people are more practiced at that form of munication.
But Hancock says it is also very important and effective whether a conversation is being recorded and could be reread, and whether it occurs in real time. People appear to be afraid to lie when they know that they will be responsible for what they have said in the conversation, he says. This is why fewer lies appear in e-mail than on the phone.
People are also more likely to lie in real time---in an instant message or phone call, say---than if they have time to think of a response, says Hancock. He found many lies are sudden or immediate responses to demands that they don’t expect, such as: “Do you like my dress?”
Hancock hopes his research will help business panies work out the best ways for their employees to municate. For instance, the phone might be the best medium for selling their products where employees are encouraged to stretch the truth. But given his results, work assessment, where honesty is regarded as more important than others, might be best done using e-mails.
Jeff Hancock’s study on lying in different ways of munications
The     71     from the statistics of the investigation
Lies bee     72     when the municating ways change from     73     to instant messages to face-to-face interactions to phone call.
The     74     why people lie / don’t lie
People won’t lie when their conversations will be recorded and can be reread, or when they know they should be     75     for what have said.
People lie in real time mostly because they have to answer     76    questions without hesitation.
The     77     that business panies can learn from the study
Using telephones for     78     because their employees can stretch the truth.
Using e-mails for work assessment because their employees must tell what they’ve done     79    .
The inference(推断) from the study
Suitable media should be chosen for different     80     purposes.
71. finding / conclusion   72. more   73. e-mails   74. reasons   75. responsible