LONDON: What could possibly be wrong with planting trees? The benefits are obvious; they f

发布时间:2020-08-16 19:56:34

LONDON: What could possibly be wrong with planting trees? The benefits are obvious; they  firm the soil, soak up (摄取) extra water and take carbon dioxide (二氧化碳) out of the atmosphere.
However, it now turns out that planting trees could add to global warming.
Tree roots do a great job of keeping soil firmly on the ground and out of the wind’s power. The problem is that some of those dust clouds play an important part in taking in carbon dioxide.
Huge dust storms blow out over the oceans from dry parts of North Africa and central Asia. Tons of dust are lifted and left as a thin film over the ocean surface. The dust fuels oceanic life.
Dust from China is carried east and left in the Pacific Ocean. If a tree-planting programme there is successful and the dust supply reduced, the final result may be that less carbon dioxide gets locked away in the ocean.
Andy Ridgwell, an environmental scientist from the University of East Anglia, has spent the past few years studying dust and says his work “shows clearly the plexity of the system and the importance of not tinkering(粗劣地修补) with it without understanding the results. For this reason the need is to focus(集中) on cutting carbon dioxide giving off rather than monkeying (瞎弄) about with the land surface.”
An American scientist, Robert Jackson, has shown that when native grassland areas are invaded(侵入) by trees, carbon is lost from the soil. “We are studying why the soil carbon disappears, but one theory is that trees do a lot more of their growing above ground pared to grasses, so less carbon goes directly into the soil from trees, ” says Jackson.
In wet areas of the world, the gain from trees absorbing carbon dioxide above ground seems to be outweighed(超过) by the loss of carbon from the soil below ground. Countries that plan to bat global warming by planting trees may have to think again.
Solutions to environmental problems are often more plex than they first appear, and understanding the Earth’s climate is a very great challenge.
【小题1】People usually hold the opinion that    .A.huge dust storms can destroy carbon dioxideB.huge dust storms can destroy the oceans on the earthC.huge dust storms can’t do anything beneficial for manD.planting trees is the only way to control huge dust storms【小题2】 Andy Ridgwell, the environmental scientist, believes that    .A.dust plays a more important part than treesB.trees shouldn’t have been planted in dry placesC.carbon dioxide is harmful to everything on the earthD.environmental problems are more plex than expected【小题3】 Robert Jackson’s experiment proves that    .A.grassland areas should be covered by forestsB.trees hold more carbon than grassesC.carbon can turn grass into dustD.less carbon can make trees grow fasterC 

网友回答

(答案→)C 
解析:
【小题1】根据短文第四五段描述,可知作者认为沙尘暴对人类一点好处都没有,故选C
【小题1】根据第六段says his work “shows clearly the plexity of the system and the importance of not tinkering(粗劣地修补) with it without understanding the results.描述,可知环境问题比预期的要复杂的多.故选D
【小题1】根据倒数第二段“We are studying why the soil carbon disappears, but one theory is that trees do a lot more of their growing above ground pared to grasses, so less carbon goes directly into the soil from trees, ”描述,可知树木能比草吸收更多的碳素.故选B
以上问题属网友观点,不代表本站立场,仅供参考!