Ausubel of Rockefeller University in New York, US. says the key renewable energy sources,

发布时间:2020-08-15 02:20:06


Ausubel of Rockefeller University in New York, US. says the key renewable energy sources, including sun, wind and biofuels, would all require vast     1    of land if developed up to large scale production1 – unlike nuclear power. That land would be far better left alone2, he says. Renewables look attractive when they are quite     2   . But if we start producing renewable energy on a large scale, the fallout is going to be horrible. Instead, Ausubel argues     3    renewed development of nuclear.
Ausubel draws his conclusions by analysing the amount of energy renewables, natural gas and nuclear can produce in terms of power per square metre of land used3. Moreover, he claims that as renewable energy use increases, this measure of efficiency4 will        4    as the best land for wind, biofuels, and solar power gets used up.
Using biofuels to obtain the     5    amount of energy as a 1000 megawatt nuclear power plant would require 2500 square kilometres of farm     6   , Ausubel says. We should be sparing land for nature5, not using it as pasture for cars and trucks, he adds.
Solar power is much more efficient than biofuel in terms of the area of land     7   , but it would still require 150 square kilometres of photovoltaic cells to     8    the energy production of the 1000 MW nuclear plant. In another example, he says meeting the 2005 US electricity demand via wind power alone would need 780,000 square kilometres, an area the size of Texas.
However, several experts are highly critical     9    Ausubel’s conclusions. John Turner of the US government’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory says that     10    the US got all of its power from solar energy, it would still need less than half the amount of land that has been paved over for highways. Further, it need not     11    additional land. The US could get a quarter of its energy just from covering rooftops of     12    buildings, he says.
According to Turner, the same dual use also applies to wind power6. The footprint for wind7 is only 5% of the land that it     13   . Farmers can still farm the land that the turbines are on8. Turner says looking solely at land use is an oversimplification of the     14   . I’m not sure I’d want to build one of these nuclear plants in Afghanistan9, but we could     15    put in wind and solar power, he adds.
【小题1】A. figures       B. amounts          C, unmbers        D. digits
【小题2】A.smallB.hugeC.littleD.vast【小题3】A.atB.overC.forD.against【小题4】A.expandB.minimizeC.enlargeD.decrease【小题5】A.sameB.similarC.alikeD.identical【小题6】A.regionB.siteC.areaD.land【小题7】A.leasedB.cultivatedC.usedD.purchased【小题8】A.patchB.matchC.catchD.fetch【小题9】A.inB.withC.ofD.on【小题10】A.even ifB.only ifC.what ifD.as if【小题11】A.lock upB.take upC.give upD.set up【小题12】A.toweringB.interestingC.nice-lookingD.existing【小题13】A.surroundsB.containsC.includesD.covers【小题14】A.issueB.stuffC.summaryD.suggestion【小题15】A.doubtfullyB.supposedlyC.certainlyD.honestlyB 

网友回答

(答案→)B 
解析:
【小题1】虽然四个选项的词(figures 数字, amounts 数量,numbers 数目,digits 数码)都是与数字有关的,在 of land 之前,要用 amounts.B 是答案。
【小题2】在 Renewables look attractive when they are quite     ?   . But if we start
producing renewable energy on a large scale, the fallout is going to be horrible这两个句子之间,
有个连词 But, 说明两个句子的意思相反。后一句说,如果大规模开发可再生能源,其后果
十分可怕。既然 大规模、可怕,前一句填入空格的词应该与之相反。选项 A 是 small,
正符合要求,A 是答案。
【小题3】Ausubel 是不赞成大规模开发可再生能源的。空3后出现 nuclear, 可以合理地推论出,这是他赞同的能源。所以要选 C 的for.argue by (通过……进行争论), argue over (就……进行争论), argue against (争论以反对)都不符合上下文的意思。
【小题4】前面一句说,Ausubel 对可再生能源、天然气和核电厂发出的电量与其占用土地
的量的比值作一比较。空4所在的句子说,随着风力发电、生物燃料发电和太阳能发电占
用的最好的土地逐渐用完,这个效率比值会发生什么变化呢?从 gets used up 分析,效率
比值应该变小才对。所以要选 D的 decrease.minimize (使最小化)不符合上下文的意思。
【小题5】从句子的意思和词的搭配上看,填入 空5的词是选项 A 的 same.same…as 是
固定搭配。填入 same 之后,句子的意思也完整了,即:用生物燃料得到与 1000 兆瓦核
电厂相同的能量需要 2500 平方公里的耕地。
【小题6】前文说的效率比值都是以 land 为标尺,所以这儿要选 A 的  land.
【小题7】句子的意思是:按     ?   土地计算,太阳能的效率比生物燃料的效率高得多 .最适合填入的词是 C 的 used.其它三个选项 leased (租借)、cultivated (耕种)、purchased (购买)都不符合上下文的意思.
【小题8】本题只能选 B 的 match (相匹配),其它三个选项,即 patch (补缀)、catch (捕捉)、fetch (取来)只是与 match 发音接近,意思与上下文不匹配。
【小题9】critical 要求后接 of.C 是答案
【小题10】John Turner 是反对 Ausubel 的计算方法的。从空10所在的句子分析, the US got all of its power from solar energy 应该是一个让步状语从句,选 A 的 even if 是对的。此外,only if (决不……除非)、what if (如果……怎么办)、as if (仿佛)的意思都与上下文搭不上,也佐证了选 A 是正确的。
【小题11】本题只能选 B 的 take up (占用),因为用上 take up 后,上下文的意思就连贯了。其它三个选项,即 lock up(锁上)、give up (放弃)、step up (加紧)的意思与上下文不匹配。
【小题12】句子的意思是:美国仅仅从     ?    大楼的楼顶(铺设的太阳能电池板)
中就能得到四分之一的能量。从意思连贯的角度选择,选项 D 的 existing 最符合题意。
【小题13】本段第一句用了 dual use.第二句说风力发电占用土地的百分数(土地的第一
个用途)。第二句说建有涡轮发电机的土地仍然可以用于耕种(土地的第二个用途)。空
13要填的动词应该是 D 的 covers (覆盖)。the land that it (指代 wind) covers, 意为
风力发电所覆盖的土地.
【小题14】an oversimplification of the     ?    ,究竟对什么过度简单化呢? 从上下文看,应该是对占用土地问题的过度简单化。选项 A 的 issue (问题)正是上下文缺失的词。stuff (材料)、summary (总结)、suggestion (建议)都不对。
【小题15】句子的前半句是说不会在阿富汗建造核电站,后半句用 but 开始,说明前半句和后半句的意思相反。前半句用了 I'm not sure,后半句用选项 C 的 certainly, 与 not sure 的意思相反,是很合理的。
以上问题属网友观点,不代表本站立场,仅供参考!