The city can seem a cold, mean place. In the middle of so many people hurrying about their own business, a person can feel alone among the millions of others.
There is a popular view that in cities, strangers are less likely to help an elderly person cross a street or call the police when they see a bike being stolen. Recently, a New Yorker named Casey Neistat did an experiment. He chained up his bike in several public places, then stole it in a number of obvious ways, such as using a hacksaw (钢锯). He filmed everything to see whether other New Yorkers would try to stop a shameless bike theft. The result? People just walked on by.
Is this evidence of an immoral, selfish urban society? Not necessarily. According to another recent study, the way city people mind their own business is about other factors besides morality (道德).
This is called the Bystander Effect, the theory that city people do not react because of the urban enviromnent they live in.
Psychologist Dr. Harold explained why people did not involve themselves in Neistat's bike theft experiment with the Bystander Effect.
First, people who live in cities are surrounded by so much activity that they stop noticing what is going on around them. Second, they are less easy to surprise and assume every activity has a logical explanation.
The third is that people notice it, but they don't know what to do, he continued. And the fourth is fear — they know they should do something, but they're afraid to challenge someone with a hacksaw.
A lack of concern is only a small reason why people don't take action, concludes Dr. Harold.
Despite the results of Neistat's experiment, there is also evidence of a sense of team spirit that connects people in cities. All it takes is a funny joke or a shared interest to start a conversation with someone at a bus stop. When city folk are in trouble, they e together for support — famously in New York on September 11, 2001.
City society is different, but that doesn't mean it's cold or mean — it just means it's busy!
【小题1】Casey Neistat fihned everything in the experiment with the purpose of .A．proving that he was not the thiefB．telling people that bike theft was immoralC．finding out who had a sense of right and wrongD．making his experiment well-known to the public【小题2】We can infer from the third paragraph that morality .A．can partly explain a selfish urban societyB．is what our society should pay special attention toC．is the only factor that leads to a selfish urban societyD．is the root of the Bystander Effect mentioned in the passage【小题3】The underlined part September 11, 2001 in Paragraph 9 serves as .A．a reminder of the sad memoriesB．a way to prove Dr Harold's Bystander effectC．evidence that city life can be really dangerousD．an example to show team spirit connecting city people【小题4】As can be inferred from the passage, the writer probably .A．criticizes the loss of morality in urban societyB．feels sad about the result of Neistat's experimentC．thinks city people are too busy to care about othersD．disagrees that city life sometimes can be cold and meanC
网友回答
(答案→)C
解析：本文讲述了城市生活中充满了冷淡，这到底是道德的沦丧还是脚步匆匆的缘故？
【小题1】C 推断题。纽约人做这个实验的目的就是想看看是否有人会阻止他“偷”自行车。也就是说证明城市中人时候有是非观。
【小题2】A 细节推理题。根据第三段内容可知，城市中的人只管自己的事，这样的生活方式未必只与道德有关。
【小题3】D推理题。通过9.11事件，作者只是想证明当人们处于困境中时，团队精神还是存在的。
【小题4】D 推理题。根据最后一段可知，作者认为人与人之间的冷漠可能是因为人们太忙。