帮忙翻译一下Intimacy is key in a world ofconnection where individuals negotiate plex networks of friendship,minimize(减少) differences, try to reachagreement, and avoid the appearance of superiority, which would highlightdifferences. In a word of status, independence is key, because a primary meansof establishing status is to tell others what to do, and taking orders is amarker of low status. Though all humans need both intimacy and independence,women tend to focus on the first and men on the second. It as if theirlifeblood ran in different directions. Thesedifferences can give women and men differing views of the same situation, asthey did in the case of a couple I will call Linda and Josh. When Josh’s oldhigh-school friend called him at work and announced he’d be in town on businessthe following month, Josh invited him to stay for the weekend.Thatevening he informed Linda that they were going to have a houseguest, and thathe and his friend would go out together the first night to chat like old times.Linda was upset. She was going to be away on business the week before, and the Fridaynight when Josh would be out with his friend would be her first night home. Butwhat upset her the most was that Josh had made these plans on his own andinformed her of them, rather than discussing them with her before extending theinvitation. Linda would never make plans, for a weekendor an evening, without first checking with Josh. She can’t understand why hedoesn’t show her the same courtesy and consideration that she shows him. Butwhen she protests, Josh says, “I can’t say to my friend, ‘I have to ask my wifefor permission’!” To Josh, checking with his wife means seekingpermission, which implies that he is not independent, not free to act on hisown. It would make him feel like a child. To Linda, checking with her husbandhas nothing to do with permission. She assumes that spouses discuss their planswith each other because their lives are interviewed, so the actions of one haveconsequences for the other. Not only dose Linda not mind telling someone, “Ihave to check with Josh”; quite the contrary--- she likes it. It makes her feelgood to know and show that she in involved with someone, that her life is boundup with someone else’s. Linda and Josh both felt more upset by thisincident, and others like it, than seemed warranted(给…以正当理由),because it cut to the core of their primacy concerns. Linda was hurt becauseshe sensed a failure of closeness in their relationship: He didn’t care abouther as much as she cared about him. And he was hurt because he felt she wastrying to control him and limit his freedom. 英语
网友回答
【答案】 译文:
亲密关系是关键的世界里,
连接个人的友谊谈判的复杂网络,
尽量减少(减少)的差异,力争达到
协议,避免出现的优势,这将突出
不同之处. 在一个字的地位,独立性是关键,因为一个主要手段
建立状态是告诉别人做什么,并接受订单,是一个
低状态的标志物. 虽然所有的人都需要亲密和独立,
女性往往在第一次和男人的第二个重点. 它仿佛他们的
生命线在不同的方向跑了.
这些
的差异,才能带给女人和男人不同的看法相同的情况下,
他们在一对夫妇的情况下,我会请琳达和Josh. 当Josh的老
高中的朋友打电话给他的工作,并宣布他在外地出差
在随后的一个月,乔希邀请他留在周末.
该
晚上,他告诉琳达,他们将有一个家做客,和
他和他的朋友一起出去像旧时代的第一个晚上聊天.
琳达很苦恼. 她要离开前一周,周五
晚上,当Josh和他的朋友将是她的第一个晚上回家. 但
是什么让她心烦意乱的是,乔希这些对自己的计划和
通知她,而不是讨论他们与她的前延长
的邀请.
琳达永远不会做计划,一个周末
一个晚上,没有先检查与Josh. 她不明白为什么他
不告诉她,她显示他的礼貌和考虑. 但
Josh说,当她的抗议,“我不能说我的朋友,”我有问我的妻子
许可'!“
乔希,检查意味着寻求与他的妻子
许可,这意味着他是不是独立的,而不是他的自由行动
自己的. 这会让他觉得像一个孩子. 琳达,检查与她的丈夫
许可无关. 她认为配偶讨论他们的计划
相互采访,因为他们的生活,这样的行动的一个有
为其他的后果. 不仅剂量琳达不介意告诉别人,“我
要检查与乔希“,恰恰相反---她喜欢它. 这让她感到
很好的了解,并显示,她在参与的人,她的生活势必
与别人的.
琳达和Josh都感到更难过的
事件发生后,和其他人一样,似乎有理由(给...以正当理由)
因为它削减其首要关注的核心. 琳达受到了伤害,因为
她预感到了失败的亲密,他们的关系:他不关心
她尽可能她关心他. 他受伤了,因为他觉得,她wastrying控制他,限制他的自由.