求用英文描述一些关于误判死刑,导致严重后果的案例 英语
网友回答
【答案】 《原文》
2000年6月中旬,美国媒体重头报道了一举世震惊的消息：一项最新研究成果（该研究项目至2002年才正式结束）表明,美国死刑案件误判率①高达68%,有3个州死刑案件误判率高达100%.这一报道震动了全球法律界,尤其是刑事司法界.我国许多媒体也报道了这一消息[1],有些论著还引用这一结论论证美国刑事司法制度不合理,难以保障无罪的人不受刑事追究[2](P.318).
中国死刑的适用范围很广,即使不考虑研究经费的限制以及死刑案件完整的统计资料难以获得,在立法大幅度缩小死刑的适用范围之前,在中国进行类似研究都是非常困难的.此外,考虑到中国法学界对死刑的研究目前尚停留在从理论上讨论其存废以及从诉讼程序本身研究如何保障其正确适用,那么美国学者对死刑误判问题进行的精确的定量研究②以及从政治、经济、社会、人口等多视角对导致死刑误判因素的全方位分析对于中国学者研究死刑乃至整个刑事司法制度都具有非常重要的启迪价值.然而令人遗憾的是,在对这一研究结论表示震惊之后,我国却没有学者对这一研究作更深入的探讨,甚至对这一研究作比较全面介绍的论著都尚付阙如.本文试图对这一研究的基本思路和主要结论作一全面介绍,并对其存在的不足及对我国可能具有的启迪价值作一初步分析,以期对我国死刑乃至整个刑事司法制度的研究以及改革与完善有所裨益.
《译文》
In mid-June 2000,United States media reported over again shocked the message:a new study results (officially ended the research project until 2002) showed that United States death penalty case rate of misjudgment ① as much as 68%,there are 3 state death penalty cases wrongful conviction rate was 100%.The report shocked the global legal profession,particularly the criminal justice munity.Many of our media have also reported the news [1],some papers also cited the conclusion that the demonstration of United States criminal justice system is not reasonable,it is difficult to protect innocent people from criminal action [2] (P.318).A wide scope of application of death penalty in China,even if they do not take into account research funding restrictions,and death penalty cases full of statistics it is difficult to obtain,before the legislation significantly narrow the scope of application of the death penalty,a similar study in China is very difficult.In addition,consider to China Law territories on death penalty of research currently is stay in from theory discussion its save waste and from litigation program itself research how protection its correctly applies,so United States scholars on death penalty misjudgment problem for of accurate of quantitative research ② and from political,and economic,and social,and population,more perspective on led death penalty misjudgment factors of Omni-directional analysis for China scholars research death penalty and entire criminal judicial system are has very important of enlightenment value.However regrettable that,after the conclusions this study expressed shock,but not scholars on research for further discussion on this,even in the more prehensive introduction to the study of the works are still paid absence.This article attempts to this basic idea and main findings of the study made a prehensive presentation,and the defects of and the Enlightenment values that may have made a preliminary analysis,to the death penalty in our country and the whole criminal justice system with a view to benefit research and reform and improvement. 追问： 有没有什么真实的案例呢？？